Comparisons · Code Security

Code Security: from the editor to the whole team.

Early detection, context for fixes and shared visibility. A continuous experience across development, CI and security management.

Why choose Oryon

  1. Analysis starts on your machine.

    Local SAST, code, dependencies and configuration in your editor workflow. You control connected features and AI assistance, according to your plan.

  2. From the editor to every delivery.

    The engine ships with the extension. Connect code analysis, dependencies and CI integrations with your team's platform in one workflow.

  3. One review the whole team can reuse.

    Shared suppressions, history, scan comparisons, CSV exports and PDF reports. Detection becomes ongoing work your team can track.

Capabilities, side by side.

10 alternatives · 12 criteria · Inspectable evidence

Sources reviewed: 2026-10-29

  • Documented
  • Plan / configuration
  • Separate product
  • Engine integration
  • Not documented

Select a symbol to inspect its scope and sources.

Scroll across to see the full comparison.

Comparison of the named products and editions using their official sources. A dash means we have not found sufficient documentation for that criterion, not that the feature does not exist. This is not an effectiveness benchmark. Open each cell for conditions and scope.
What you need Code Security Semgrep OpenGrep SonarQube Snyk Code Aikido GitHub Code Security Checkmarx One Veracode GitLab Endor Labs
Editor integration
Static code analysis
Dependencies
Secrets
CI integration
AI-assisted fixes
SAST without SaaS code upload
Infrastructure & configuration
Profiles & exclusions
Selective MDN compatibility
Shared triage decisions
History & reporting

Compare approaches

Turn your evaluation into a next step.

Let's discuss your repository, team and the evidence you need.