Why choose Oryon over Aikido
Keep analysis alongside your code: local detection, help understanding the risk and shared results from the editor to CI and the platform.
Why choose Oryon
-
Analysis starts on your machine.
Local SAST, code, dependencies and configuration in your editor workflow. You control connected features and AI assistance, according to your plan.
-
From the editor to every delivery.
The engine ships with the extension. Connect code analysis, dependencies and CI integrations with your team's platform in one workflow.
-
One review the whole team can reuse.
Shared suppressions, history, scan comparisons, CSV exports and PDF reports. Detection becomes ongoing work your team can track.
Capabilities, side by side.
| What you need | Aikido | |
|---|---|---|
| Editor integration | Documented Scan as you edit or save, or start a file or repository scan; configure profiles and exclusions. | Documented Official plugins ↗ |
| Static code analysis | Documented Static analysis of code, secrets, infrastructure, pipelines and AI/MCP security. Combines patterns with data tracking within each file. Profiles and exclusions adapt the scan to the repository. | Documented Aikido SAST ↗ |
| Dependencies | Documented Extends the inventory of packages and their relationships from the repository, including Maven projects. Automatically attempted in the extension and CI; native analyzers provide a fallback when it is unavailable. | Documented SCA in IDE and platform ↗ |
| Secrets | Documented Static analysis of code, secrets, infrastructure, pipelines and AI/MCP security. Combines patterns with data tracking within each file. Profiles and exclusions adapt the scan to the repository. | Documented IDE, repositories and CI ↗ |
| CI integration | Documented Run the same analysis core from GitHub Actions and Azure Pipelines, with OIDC and a project token. | Documented Scans and gating policies ↗ |
| AI-assisted fixes | Optional / plan dependent Explains causes, risk and impact and proposes changes, diffs, effort and verification checks. Available according to plan and configuration; the user reviews and applies the proposal in the editor. | Optional / plan dependent AutoFix, scope and activation dependent ↗ |
| SAST without SaaS code upload | Documented OpenGrep bundled with the extension; local SAST works offline once the engine is extracted. AI and sync use the network. | Documented Local Scanner analyzes without sending source code to Aikido; results are synchronized. ↗ |
| Infrastructure & configuration | Documented Rules for Terraform, Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD and configuration; coverage depends on format and rule. | Documented IaC is part of repository scanning. ↗ |
| Profiles & exclusions | Documented production_security/full profiles, path inclusion and exclusion, and .gitignore support. | Documented Custom SAST rules and repository configuration. ↗ |
| Selective MDN compatibility | Documented Selective MDN assessment: String.replaceAll against configured browsers. Other warnings require validation; this is not a general browser compatibility audit. | Not documented in this scope No MDN compatibility assessment documented in the reviewed scope. ↗ |
| Shared triage decisions | Documented Project-level shared false-positive suppressions, with restoration from the extension and dashboard. | Documented Ignore, snooze and adjust severity according to permissions. ↗ |
| History & reporting | Documented History, comparisons, audit PDF and JSON/CSV exports. The advanced AI report depends on the plan. | Documented Trends and CSV reports according to permissions. ↗ |
Product scope
Code Security
Keep analysis alongside your code: local detection, help understanding the risk and shared results from the editor to CI and the platform.
Aikido
AppSec platform for code, dependencies, cloud and runtime, with local scanners and IDE integrations.
Risk detection, prioritization and assisted remediation from the editor through repositories and CI.
Official sources
Sources reviewed: 2026-10-29