Team memory

Shared Security Memory for Teams That Need More Than a Single Scan

A security workflow breaks down when every scan starts from zero. Oryon treats linked repositories as shared memory, so suppressions, findings, and project history persist across developers and future scans.

Shared Security Memory

What gets lost when security has no shared memory

Repository-linked findings and dependency vulnerabilities synced in bulk when the repo is linked.

  • Your team needs suppressions and scan history to survive beyond one local session.
  • You want the dashboard to act as shared memory instead of as the primary scanner.
  • You need a tighter connection between developer workflow and team-wide follow-up.

Why memory matters

What gets lost when security has no shared memory

What breaks in practice

  • The same harmless findings come back because past decisions are not attached to the repository.
  • Different developers see the same issue differently because there is no durable team state behind the scan.
  • Leadership sees snapshots instead of a continuing story of findings, suppressions, and progress.

How it works

How local scans become shared team state

01

Link a repository to a project

Inside the workflow

The extension identifies the repository and links it to a project so future uploads belong to the same team context.

What persists

This is what turns isolated local scans into a continuity layer that survives individual sessions.

02

Sync findings and dependency state in bulk

Inside the workflow

Once linked, findings and dependency vulnerabilities can be uploaded in chunks so the dashboard reflects the latest scan state for that repository.

What persists

That gives engineering and AppSec the same shared reference point without changing where the scan originally ran.

03

Carry suppressions and history forward

Inside the workflow

Shared suppressions and scan history stay connected to the repository so later scans reuse that context instead of rebuilding it from scratch.

What persists

That is the difference between a one-off scanner and a system the team can operate continuously.

Best fit

When shared security memory becomes a real advantage

Choose Oryon if

  • Your team needs suppressions and scan history to survive beyond one local session.
  • You want the dashboard to act as shared memory instead of as the primary scanner.
  • You need a tighter connection between developer workflow and team-wide follow-up.

Choose another model if

  • You do not need repository-linked continuity after the first scan.
  • Shared suppressions and scan history are not important to your operating model.
  • Your team wants to centralize the scanning engine itself rather than preserve a local-first layer.

FAQ

Questions teams ask when they want continuity after the first scan

What exactly becomes shared memory?
The shared layer can include linked project state, findings, dependency vulnerabilities, suppressions, and scan history tied to the repository.
Do developers still work locally?
Yes. Shared security memory does not replace the local-first workflow. It preserves the state that should remain useful after the local scan is done.
Why does this help reduce repeat review work?
Because the team no longer re-decides the same harmless findings or loses the context of earlier scans every time a repository is scanned again.