Oryon Flow vs Shannon (Keygraph)

1. 01

   A journey that reaches repair

   Flow integrates revalidated repairs and delivery. Shannon Open Source produces a report; Keygraph provides fix PRs in commercial editions.

2. 02

   The application gets rebuilt too

   Flow prepares its target in a lab as well as isolating workers. Shannon takes a repository and an already-running application.

3. 03

   An explicit view of unresolved work

   Flow retains confirmations, refutations and inconclusive results and connects them with current and projected technical controls.

Capabilities, side by side.

The table describes documented features; it does not measure performance or detection quality. Commercial features may depend on product, plan and configuration.

What you need	Oryon Flow	Shannon (Keygraph)
Repository investigation	✓Documented Source, packages, infrastructure and runtime connected in one investigation.	✓Documented Analyzes repository architecture and data flows to guide attacks against a running application. ↗
Reconstructed test environment	✓Documented Rebuilds the application in ephemeral, isolated environments from the original repository.	—Not documented in this scope The worker is ephemeral and isolated; a live target is supplied separately. Automatic target rebuilding is not established. ↗
Finding verification	✓Documented Independently reviewed proof method: confirmed, refuted or inconclusive. Missing proof remains an open question.	✓Documented Reports vulnerabilities demonstrated through exploitation with reproducible proofs. ↗
Fixes backed by tests	✓Documented Isolated candidates; checks security and legitimate behavior before an independent review.	↗Another suite product Fixes with re-analysis and exploit replay belong to Keygraph Pro and Enterprise, rather than Shannon OSS. ↗
Reviewable pull requests	✓Documented Groups changes by cause and compatibility into reviewable PRs. Your team decides the merge.	↗Another suite product Keygraph Pro and Enterprise create fix PRs; Shannon OSS delivers reports per run. ↗
Traceable technical evidence	✓Documented Links proofs and changes to technical requirements; compares current evidence with the projection from verified PRs.	✓Documented Shannon exports PDF, Markdown, JSON and SARIF; commercial editions add findings management and audit evidence. ↗
Source + runtime analysis	✓Documented Connects source, dependency, infrastructure and dynamic observations in the same investigation.	✓Documented Combines source analysis with live exploitation; commercial editions expand SAST, SCA and secrets coverage. ↗
Authenticated role testing	✓Documented Checks legitimate sessions, roles and tenant boundaries; unreachable or expired sessions remain coverage gaps.	↗Another suite product OSS supports authenticated scans; commercial black-box testing explicitly supports up to four role accounts. ↗
Separate validation	✓Documented The proposing agent does not approve its own conclusion or fix; a separate verification step evaluates retained evidence.	✓Documented Analysis proposes candidates and exploitation proves them; commercial editions add review passes and deterministic checks. ↗
Functional regression checks	✓Documented Compares security proofs, legitimate controls and available functional tests with the original before delivery.	—Not documented in this scope Commercial fixes receive re-analysis and exploit replay; a functional regression suite is not specified. ↗
Dependency fixes	✓Documented Repair candidates can update the dependency graph and adapt application code, subject to validation.	↗Another suite product Commercial editions include SCA and fix PRs; package-update coverage depends on the finding. ↗
Technical requirement mapping	✓Documented Links retained evidence to selected technical requirements and shows current versus proposed coverage; this is not organizational certification.	—Not documented in this scope Commercial audit evidence and governance are documented; technical control mapping is not specified. ↗

Product scope